'00 Z/28 Vs. '03 Mach 1

**preston1980** · 06-09-2007, 07:58 AM

Originally Posted by MikeSomething

Yea, I've wanted to race one for awhile. They seem like a rare car to come across around my area. Well, he gets on my ass and there's a ton of traffic, so once it clears I hang off in the right lane and we both get a straight away. He gets along side of me and we both hit it. I got a car on him and stayed right there all the way upto 110mph when we both hit traffic again and let off. I gave him the thumbs up, but apparently that wasn't good enough for him. So... we go at it again from 40 upto about 120mph where I had him by 1 1/2 car lengths. I honestly thought he was gonna destroy my car since I heard his cams & loud ass exhaust, but I held my own. Mods in sig...

Nice kill, The Machs can run. They are a good race for a LS1.

**Raoul-Duke** · 06-09-2007, 08:00 AM

Originally Posted by BLKCLOUD

I have a hard time believing you haven't been banned/warned/whatever yet.

Please go back to Mustangworld.

Thanks.

i think hes just upset that he owns and drives a 95 gt,lol...i'd be pretty aggravated too,lol

**02sunsetorangeZ** · 06-09-2007, 08:45 AM

he's an E-Thug

**00ssSLP** · 06-09-2007, 11:51 AM

Originally Posted by preston1980

Looks like you got the response you were looking for?

I will only start to pick on the people who try to belittle others. Honestly I would have done the same for a mustang owner if a lot of LS1 guys were messing with him. People come to a site like this to do a couple different things and posting kills is one of them. It can happen either way mustang<LS1 or mustang>LS1 it just depends on how big your wallet is. Sh!t I got bet by an 89 coupe with a 347 and spray witch was to be expected

it happens people should get over it.

**Blackout** · 06-09-2007, 12:07 PM

i agree there will always be someone faster no matter what kind of car it is.

**BLKCLOUD** · 06-09-2007, 12:23 PM

My post referred solely to the poster, not his car. Just because it is a 95 GT doesn't mean it can't be fast. That's about the same thing as saying just because a Camaro is an LT1 and not an LS1, it must not be fast.

Both of those statements are inaccurate.
Bob

**MikeSomething** · 06-09-2007, 01:22 PM

Originally Posted by 02sunsetorangeZ

he's an E-Thug

Like this...

**00ssSLP** · 06-09-2007, 01:24 PM

I don't care if it’s the fastest car in this forum, if there going to be a a$$ there car is a piece of sh!t just like them. (not that the guy that has the fastest car on this forum is an a$$ or a Piece of Sh!t because I don’t know them and I’m sure there not anyway, just making a point)

**Mach1Mustang** · 06-09-2007, 03:26 PM

Originally Posted by 35thAnniZ28

their nice cars..but the fact that EVERYONE has one sux..oh well...

actually they made very few machs in comp to other stangs. about 7,000 per year for 2 years.

**Mach1Mustang** · 06-09-2007, 03:34 PM

just looked and about 7k were made in 04 and about 9k made in 03. grand total of about 16.5k in two years.

**00ssSLP** · 06-09-2007, 04:35 PM

I like the color on your car Mach1Mustang, If had to choose it would be that blue or black. I would lean toward the blue on the Mach 1's it's a cool color.

**Wesman** · 06-09-2007, 07:54 PM

Originally Posted by Mach1Mustang

i can say that the kill is more than possible, unless the mach was cammed. most 4v cars that have cams have a lot more. Anyway good kill.

How much power do cammed (all 4) Mach 1's make, in general?? Just curious, I'd think it would have some good potential being that those 4V heads really breathe well stock and can turn some high RPM's.

**CDS98Z28** · 06-09-2007, 08:27 PM

i smoke my buddies cobra 4 valve all the time....and he doesn't like it or understand it ...lol

**NiteRiderWs6** · 06-09-2007, 09:52 PM

Originally Posted by Wesman

How much power do cammed (all 4) Mach 1's make, in general?? Just curious, I'd think it would have some good potential being that those 4V heads really breathe well stock and can turn some high RPM's.

well im not to sure but there is a guy that is always at the strip with his mach he has a cam,tune,and slicks and he runs 11.90's...

**BLKCLOUD** · 06-10-2007, 03:25 AM

Depending upon the cams, and assuming you're not porting/shaving the heads, a Mach 1 will probably gain 20-30 HP over the stock cams. The bottleneck is the long-runner intake.

FYI...there are several Mach 1's running deep into the 11s with bone stock long blocks (including stock cams).

**Mach1Mustang** · 06-10-2007, 07:16 AM

Originally Posted by Wesman

How much power do cammed (all 4) Mach 1's make, in general?? Just curious, I'd think it would have some good potential being that those 4V heads really breathe well stock and can turn some high RPM's.

mine should be around 580 to 625 or so at the wheels. but thats with cams, forged guts, and a d1.

**jad628** · 06-15-2007, 05:15 AM

Originally Posted by BLKCLOUD

Depending upon the cams, and assuming you're not porting/shaving the heads, a Mach 1 will probably gain 20-30 HP over the stock cams. The bottleneck is the long-runner intake.

FYI...there are several Mach 1's running deep into the 11s with bone stock long blocks (including stock cams).

Bone stock running deep into the 11's?

A bone stock Z06, Viper, or Shelby doesn't do that!!!

Care to recant/retract that statement?

**BLKCLOUD** · 06-15-2007, 06:07 AM

Nope.

Please read my post again, and notice I said "bone stock long blocks". IE...'bolt-on' cars...exhaust, gears, slicks, weight reduction - but untouched motors, and no power adders.

Bob

**jad628** · 06-15-2007, 06:11 AM

Originally Posted by BLKCLOUD

Nope.

Please read my post again, and notice I said "bone stock long blocks". IE...'bolt-on' cars...exhaust, gears, slicks, weight reduction - but untouched motors, and no power adders.

Bob

Okay.

Even if they have massive weight reduction and every bolt-on (short of power adders as you said) I still find it hard to believe they are deep in the 11's.

I found one 1/4 listing for a Mach 1 with exhaust work:

1/4 Mile ET: 12.976
1/4 Mile MPH: 104.810
1/8 Mile ET: 8.269
1/8 Mile MPH: 83.730
0-60 Foot ET: 1.769
Temperature F: 81.0
Timeslip Scan:
Car Make: Ford
Car Model: Mustang
Car Type: Mach 1
Car Year: 2003
Driver: Greg
E-Mail: Click HERE
Videos: Mustang Videos
Web Site:
http://www.lamc.ca

Less than 1.8 sec 60 time which is a good driver, and just ever so slightly under 13 seconds. Dropping 1.5 - 2 seconds (or so)off of that with bolt-ons seems like an awful lot to ask.

**Raoul-Duke** · 06-15-2007, 07:46 AM

Originally Posted by BLKCLOUD

My post referred solely to the poster, not his car. Just because it is a 95 GT doesn't mean it can't be fast. That's about the same thing as saying just because a Camaro is an LT1 and not an LS1, it must not be fast.

Both of those statements are inaccurate.
Bob

its def not like sayin a lt1 isnt fast cause its not a ls1...the 94-95 5.0 cars are garbage, and if its the 4.6...well ive seen a i/e 5spd 3.8 camaro beat an auto one....a lt1 CANNOT be compared to a 5.0 or a 4.6 sohc pos...thats like comparing a ls1 to a 305tpi