dodge challenger finally

[Turrry]

I have had...well, I can't tell you HOW many Challenger R/T guys "woof" me, rev me, etc. and NONE of them have been in a situation where I could have run them...I can't WAIT till I get the chance to finally spank one of these faggots. They are worse than the local V6 Fbody and mustang guys.

[allbaugh_04]

lol...i'd like to spank em too

[willys srt8]

mag and bench racing.

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

2007 Chrysler 300C SRT-8 4.7 0-60, 13.2@109 (C&D June 05)
2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 4.7 0-60, 13.0 (R&T July '08)
2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 4.8 0-60,13.2 (C&D Dec '07)
2005 Dodge Charger R/T 5.6 0-60, 14.2 (R&T Aug '05)
2006 Dodge Charger SRT-8 4.9 0-60, 13.3@108.2 (R&T Dec.'05)
2008 Dodge Charger SRT-8 4.8 0-60, 13.2@108 (C&D Dec 07)
2005 Dodge Magnum R/T AWD 5.9 0-60, 14.5 (C&D Aug '05)
2005 Dodge Magnum SRT8 5.1 0-60, 13.6 (C&D Sept '05)

1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 0-60, 14.1
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.3 0-60, 13.8
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.2 0-60, 13.7
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.2 0-60, 13.6


1993 Pontiac Firebird Firehawk 4.9 0-60, 13.5
1993 Pontiac Firebird Formula 6.1 0-60, 14.7
1993 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 6.3 0-60, 14.8
1994 Pontiac Firebird Formula 5.8 0-60, 14.1
1995 Pontiac SLP Firehawk 5.3 0-60, 13.9
1995 Pontiac Firebird Formula 6.7 0-60, 15.1
1995 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 5.6 0-60, 14.0
1996 Pontiac Firebird Formula 5.8 0-60, 14.3
1997 Pontiac Firebird 3.8l 7.2 0-60, 15.5 (C&D Jun '97)
1998 Pontiac Firebird Formula 5.3 0-60, 13.9 (C&D Jun '98)
1998 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 5.1 0-60, 13.4
2000 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am (WS6) 4.9 0-60, 13.4

2004 Pontiac GTO LS1 5.3 0-60, 13.8
2005 Pontiac GTO LS2 5.2 0-60, 13.7@103.9 w/MT (R&T Dec 05)
2005 Pontiac GTO V8 w/6 Spd 4.8 0-60, 13.3 (C&D Jan '05)


and the list goes on. just line up and be done with it. GET IT ON VID seeing is believing

[nurmikko22]

I have a 2002 M6 trans am with lid and muffler and I ran a challenger r/t auto from a dig and from a roll. When we went from a dig we only went to 60 mph but by that time my back bumper was at his front bumper (I also spun on the take off). We then had to slow for traffic, but then lined up again and did a 50-110 run. As soon we started, I was walking away from him no problem and when I let off around 110, I was easily 2-3 cars ahead of him. I would think that the SRT-8 would pretty much be a drivers race.

[1 RedHot TransAm]

I have a 2002 M6 trans am with lid and muffler and I ran a challenger r/t auto from a dig and from a roll. When we went from a dig we only went to 60 mph but by that time my back bumper was at his front bumper (I also spun on the take off). We then had to slow for traffic, but then lined up again and did a 50-110 run. As soon we started, I was walking away from him no problem and when I let off around 110, I was easily 2-3 cars ahead of him. I would think that the SRT-8 would pretty much be a drivers race.

+1 SRT8 is a drivers race, I watched my buddy run one in a 02 SS basically stock, lid, catback

[cobrakiller99]

i need to get this kid to come out of his house and race me.

[hutch1999]

Mopars are kind of like plus size women, they can look pretty and get the job done, but in the end they are still to damn heavy.

[Dann]

dude i raced one not long ago....pfft didnt have anything special. i thing you'll take it easly

[allbaugh_04]

nice first post lol

[big hammer]

nice first post lol

i guess it was important enough to make an account for

[Deuuuce]

i think he is new to racing, but its an automatic too. so its pretty easy for him to drive it. so you guys think ill win?

If he doesn't know the gearing, factors like heat soak, ESP off/fully off and stuff like that, you'll win.

but there is no top end in any Dodge.

Hilarious statement with 109-110mph stock trap speed SRT-8s and Furman trapping 130mph in his bone stock ACR.

once again our cars run best at the top end and should be able to take him

So do SRT-8s and will pull an LS1 at triple digits.

SRT 8 brings on a whole new beast. Quick hint (there dogs off the line) Run him from a stop light. 20's dont hook for shit....

Jeff

Dogs only if they can't hook. Otherwise 1.9 60fts are standard.

Car and drivers numbers aren't accurate..... Believe me I'd love to see you take him. I was at Byron IL's dragstrip last saturday and there was a black one there that still had new plates on it and was stock cause I talked to him and it was running 12.7's all day. Hard to get those 20's to hook so a street race could be another story.

For a stock one to run 12.7s "all day" he would need low 1.9 60fts, cool downs and a negative DA with no headwind. And his trap speeds would have to be 110mph.

12.7's stock?? at what speeds? i know car and driver has weak drivers, and they only got 13.8 out of the srt8. however the kicker is they only managed to pull a 103 trap speed. regardless of how you drive, pretty near impossible to run a 12.7 with a 103ish trap on street tires.

No Edmunds ran a 13.6 @ 105mph and attributed the .5 better ET vs. the 300C SRT-8 to the hood scoop. They don't know cars, at all. Car & Driver has very good drivers and they tend to be spot-on for non-drag prepped, non-powershifted cars in good conditions.

I'm guessing a lot of bad information. Not trying to start a fight, but LS1's are walking that dog and kicking that cat on RT's, and SRT-8's all day.

Uh huh. I like how guys with mods beat SRT-8s but stock they tend to lose.

edmunds also got a 13.8 @ 103 out of the charger--- something is up with these cars. some seem to fly and some seem awful.

See above.

[blackSS01]

^ You also stated in another thread about how good Toyotas are. Here is the order JD Power has these three motors rated.

Chevy 5.7 9.8 PPH
Ford 4.6 13.1 PPH
Toyota 5.7 15.6 PPH


PPH = Problems per hundred

GM won engine of the year with the LS1 and has now gotten their plants running at a exceptional rate by changing the way engine blocks are made. Cross threading in a plant is a main reason for errors. GM was the first to get down to 99.9% with 0 PPM

PPM = Problems per million.

I have the article but no scanner. Just thought everyone should know this little tid bit of info when considering vehicles. And the PPH/PPM also goes for GM's 4.8/5.3/5.7/6.0

Food for thought.

[big hammer]

i guess when they put 13.8@ 103 they meant to put 13.6 @ 105.

[Deuuuce]

^ You also stated in another thread about how good Toyotas are. Here is the order JD Power has these three motors rated.

Chevy 5.7 9.8 PPH
Ford 4.6 13.1 PPH
Toyota 5.7 15.6 PPH


PPH = Problems per hundred

GM won engine of the year with the LS1 and has now gotten their plants running at a exceptional rate by changing the way engine blocks are made. Cross threading in a plant is a main reason for errors. GM was the first to get down to 99.9% with 0 PPM

PPM = Problems per million.

I have the article but no scanner. Just thought everyone should know this little tid bit of info when considering vehicles. And the PPH/PPM also goes for GM's 4.8/5.3/5.7/6.0

Food for thought.

I don't doubt it for a minute, interesting info, thanks.

i guess when they put 13.8@ 103 they meant to put 13.6 @ 105.

It's Edmunds. They think .5 improvement in ET comes from a non-ram air hood scoop. It's a moot point what the video vs. what they publish says...

[big hammer]

I don't doubt it for a minute, interesting info, thanks.



It's Edmunds. They think .5 improvement in ET comes from a non-ram air hood scoop. It's a moot point what the video vs. what they publish says...

stating that srt8's are running 12.x's bone stock with no proof at all is also a moot point.

[Ramairgod84]

i raced a new one a couple weeks back goin down the road. I've got shortie headers, filter, lid, free ram air and gmmg and started pulling on him...beautiful cars..heavy bastards

[blue02Z]

wow over a month and no race-fail

[allbaugh_04]

yep, thats what i said

[RedVertTA]

Off topic, but blue02Z WTF is a penis sleeve?

[blackSS01]

Yup, over a month and no race equals mega fail. Can't believe this turn out. I wanted to know the outcome.