Results 21 to 40 of 170
Thread: F-bodies vs the new stangs
-
11-17-2008, 08:40 PM #21
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Fort Worth, Tx
- Age
- 34
- Posts
- 29
Black- 2002 Camaro Z28
ive had no problems with factory, or modded gt mustangs( exhaust, mabey a lite cam) in my factory A4 B4C.
-
11-17-2008, 10:04 PM #22
-
11-18-2008, 06:48 AM #23
mine is 3150 w/ back seats and 1/2 tank (read by needle). i think dry weight of fact t-top car is 3300.
2000 red ss: >2" drop, koni adjustables 'n 275 s-compounds all way around, giant brakes, dynatech LT's, borla catback (no plate), t56, tubular everything, HARD TOP, caged, "stock" heads 'n a mean cam. -2* front camber.
-
11-18-2008, 11:01 AM #24
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Age
- 59
- Posts
- 2,307
Hugger Orange/W stripes- 1999 Z28 M6
Did the newer Mustangs go with an IRS? My '89 LX 5.0 had a solid axle and made you pay for it whenever a bump was in the road. That is why my '94 T-bird handled so great, IRS. It wasn't even close when compared to a Mustang when the road got twisty. T-bird easily > Mustang for handling. Actually I still believe the T-bird handled better than my Z28 (stock), much better as a matter-of-fact. That's why I thought the new Mustang would handle better...IRS. But does anybody know for sure? I don't care enough to research it.
-
11-18-2008, 11:14 AM #25
unless i've completely stopped paying attention to anything but GM, it's a solid.
-
11-18-2008, 11:23 AM #26
-
11-18-2008, 11:45 AM #27
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- CANFIELD, OHIO
- Age
- 38
- Posts
- 652
PEWETER METALIC- 2002 CAMARO Z-28 M-6
No Mustangs have been IRS for several years now. I believe since 99, However their are swaps available for DR applications to bolt in an 8.8 or 9in easily.
-
11-18-2008, 11:59 AM #28
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Age
- 59
- Posts
- 2,307
Hugger Orange/W stripes- 1999 Z28 M6
Then I wasn't imagining it! The Ford IRS in the T-bird was a good handling set-up when I went aftermarket with shocks/struts and better/wider 17" wheels and tires. it sure seemed like with the demise of the T-bird in '97 that they would use the technology to improve upon the Mustang for an all-around performer.
-
11-18-2008, 12:15 PM #29
Nope. All S197 (05+) Mustangs are all solid axle, including the GT500. IRS was a consideration during development, and would have allowed Ford to make a RWD Lincoln model to replace the LS. Unfortunately, due to cost and production limitations, the IRS idea was scrapped.
At least the Mustang has the 8.8" though, which is just about as bulletproof as the Ford 9".
-
11-18-2008, 08:14 PM #30
I recently test drove an 08 Bullit because my wife loved the color (dark green) and we were entertaining the idea of a mustang as a fun commuter car, but I have to tell you, and I took it on the interstate and let her rip for several miles and made a few quick passes and lane changes, when I got out it was'nt like "wow this car is as fast as mine" or "wow this car is fast", it was'nt even like "wow", it was just ok. And it was'nt a money thing because I could have wrote them a check on the spot but it just did'nt blow my skirt up, speed or horsepower wise, maybe I am just biased to our cars? Its a nice car don't get me wrong and their was a lot I liked about it but not enough to drive it home.
And, yes sometimes when I get on mine it does give me that rush...YMMVRegards,
Todd
#cajunhotrodder on instagram
-
11-18-2008, 08:23 PM #31
no you aren't biased about our cars, you have "our" cars because you aren't biased! anyone who is honest with themselves and/or others knows the performance superiority of an LS1 f/y body. and that certainly includes the road course. . . . . . . . .
-
11-19-2008, 03:34 AM #32
-
11-19-2008, 07:40 AM #33
Our cars aren't that light. I've had both of mine on the scale,,both of our verts and a T-top.
The 97 convertable came in at 3,550 lbs. My 02 SS convertable weighs 3,620 lbs. and our current SS T-top weighs 3,560 lbs.
They are all pretty damn close and represent what 90% of all fully optioned 4th gens weigh that have had no attempt at weight reduction. Even a few of my buddies had their's on the the scales and a couple of them were even heavier than my junk.
If you are seeing 4th gens tip the scales at only 3,100 to 3,200 lbs. then they have had some serious weight reduction going on,,,,or it's a bare bones car with no options what so ever, and those are few and far between.
-
11-19-2008, 04:53 PM #34
-
11-19-2008, 05:01 PM #35
-
11-19-2008, 07:05 PM #36
Dry weight does not realistically reflect what you see on the street though,,,or the track for that matter. I've seen tons of them on the scale,,,and if they haven't been tinkered with they easily tip 3,500 or more lbs. Seen a few hit over 3,700 even.
Hell even the 1st gens,,,which are the lightest of the bunch,,,,are lucky to be as light as you mention,,,and thats with a small block. Even a bare bones no option 1st gen with a small block still tips the scales at 3,3xx or so.
-
11-19-2008, 07:43 PM #37
-
11-19-2008, 07:53 PM #38
-
11-19-2008, 08:12 PM #39
-
11-19-2008, 08:14 PM #40
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Thornton, CO
- Posts
- 23,773
Red Tint Jewelcoat- 2008 Trailblazer SS
Doesn't help that I have a Moser 9" and iron block though.
If I remember...it was 3450 with a 1/4 tank stock.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
its also still fun to kill 6 banger stangs lol
By Speedy_Gonzales in forum Kill StoriesReplies: 117Last Post: 02-05-2010, 09:46 AM -
Any of you guys know fox body stangs?
By EnjoiJoe in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 38Last Post: 08-08-2009, 03:23 PM -
Two New Stangs...Slain>>> by Po-Po
By Crimson Sin in forum Kill StoriesReplies: 8Last Post: 06-19-2008, 05:51 PM -
Why So Many Stangs...............?
By matthewaqui in forum Domestics and ForeignsReplies: 25Last Post: 03-30-2008, 01:29 PM -
Why are Stangs so much slower?
By H8machine in forum Domestics and ForeignsReplies: 270Last Post: 09-11-2006, 05:31 PM
Bookmarks